|Humanities in EU|
European Consortium for Humanities Institutes and Centres
Liège will host the World Humanities Conference from Sunday, 6 to Saturday, 12 August 2017. Co-organized by UNESCO, the International Council for Philosophy and Human Sciences (ICPHS) and LIEGETOGETHER, this congress will gather about 1800 participants from all over the world working in the fields of science, politics, art and communication, as well as representatives of international, governmental and non-governmental organizations. For more information, please see the official invitation flier or check the conference website.
We are pleased to announce that the new Board of ECHIC was elected during the Annual Meeting in Macerata in April. Prof. Silvana Colella from the University of Macerata became the new Chair of ECHIC, with the secretariat also to be hosted at the Humanities Department of the same university. Luís Adão da Fonseca (CEPESE, Oporto) was found willing to renew his mandate as Treasurer. Jo Shaw (IASH, University of Edinburgh), Alex Hansen (ICS, University of Navarra) and Ortwin de Graef (KU Leuven) were elected as members at large.
The Centre for the Humanities at Utrecht University, the Netherlands, in cooperation with ECHIC, proudly present an initiative ‘The Humanities in Europe Interview Series’, and would like to invite members of ECHIC to contribute to building the cartography of the European landscape of the humanities. Read more here.
See video series introduction here: http://cfh-lectures.hum.uu.nl/the-humanities-in-europe-interview-series-trailer/
European Commission’s DG Research and Innovation presented the first report on the integration of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in Horizon 2020. This monitoring and evaluation report assesses how the different SSH disciplines have been integrated into the projects funded in 2014 under the Societal Challenges and the Industrial Leadership priorities. The report is now available online.
European Alliance for Social Sciences and Humanities (EASSH) in response published a position on the report, in which they welcome the publication of it and point to the issues that call for urgent attention.
The Commission flagged around 37% of the topics under the 2014 calls as likely to invite SSH contributions. Based on the consolidated results, the Commission reports itself that only a quarter of consortia partners in projects funded under topics flagged for SSH have SSH expertise and will contribute it to their projects. When excluding Societal Challenge 6, the share of SSH partners amounts to less than a fifth. Even more worrying is the fact that 28% of funded projects under the SSH-flagged topics in 2014 do not include any SSH research dimension to address the issues at stake and do not include any SSH partner.
Around 16% of the funding in those projects will be allocated to SSH research. Across the 2014 calls addressing Europe’s major societal challenges as few as 7% of projects will benefit from insights from social and humanities scholars. In total, the share of budget going to SSH partners out of the total call budget will stand only at 6%.
European Alliance for Social Sciences and Humanities (EASSH) therefore highlighted the issues that need to be addressed urgently:
Improve the data collection systems which can improve both the accuracy in tracing SSH participation and improve transparency around the data collection
Work with the SSH community to develop a more robust methodology for analysing the integration of SSH research in projects. Measuring the number of so called “SSH Partners” is not a robust indicator of the depth of integration in the fundamental research of any project
Review the membership of the European Advisory Groups and Evaluation panels where the current minimal levels of SSH representation need to be addressed as a matter of urgency. Little input to the design of work programmes and framing of topics, along with lack of SSH experience has contributed to the low integration of SSH in projects.
Full text of the EASSH response is available here.
Prof. Montserrat Herrero, University of Navarra: 'Humanities and Communities of Interpretation' (panel on Civic Humanities)
Prof. Marisa Ronan, Trinity College Dublin: 'Humanities Without Walls' (panel on Civic Humanities)
Prof. Paolo Monti, Sacro Cuore Catholic University: 'Humanities and Citizenship' (panel on Civic Humanities)
On Friday 16th January 2015 the 'European Alliance for Social Sciences and Humanities' (EASSH) took a major step in building a strong coalition of more than 50 associations, scientific networks and disciplines in Paris. EASSH will act as a two-way channel between researchers in SSH and civil society, private partners and policy makers as a resource for Europe and the world. EASSH will act by every necessary means to give to SSH the room they deserve in European programmes. At this occasion, the French Minister of Education, High education and Research, Najat Vallaud Belkacem gave her full support to this enterprise and highlighted the particular need for the social sciences and humanities in Europe.
As a founding member ECHIC has played a prominent role in the setting up of the organisation, and the ECHIC President Poul Holm continues as a members of the EASSH executive.
For more information please see:
Last month some of the UK national contact points (NCP) hosted an event specifically aimed at a humanities audience to give an overview of opportunities in Europe. Read the report of the event on Research Beyond Borders website.
This international conference brings together academics interested in the development of Literary and Cultural Studies in Europe and beyond with European policymakers. The language of the conference will be English. Venue: Birkbeck, University of London: Gordon Square WC1H 0PD and Malet Street (Torrington Place) WC1E 7HX. The conference includes five keynote talks, 36 short papers, a policymaker panel, an art installation, a film showing, a book-launch, a poster session and a practical workshop.
Researchers practising literary-and-cultural studies [LCS] examine a vast range of social and cultural objects through the lens of literary thinking – analysing textuality, fictionality, rhetoricity and historicity, and developing 'cultural literacy'. How can LCS research and cultural literacy contribute to solving the major challenges of Europe today?
Cultural memory, Translation & migration, Digital textuality, Biopolitics & the body
Prof Aleida Assmann, Prof Michael Cronin, Prof Lars Elleström, Prof Sir David King & Prof Alexandre Quintanilha
Dr Monika Dietl, Prof Maureen Freely, Dr Philippe Keraudren, Prof Svend Erik Larsen, Prof Wolfgang Mackiewicz, Angela Schindler-Daniels, Prof Milena Žic Fuchs
Queries to http://cleurope.eu/contact/
The Humanities World Report 2015 is now downloadable as an open access publication by Palgrave. The download link is http://www.palgraveconnect.com/pc/browse/listcollection?pcode=oa
The first of its kind, this Report gives an overview of the humanities worldwide. Published as an Open Access title and based on an extensive literature review and enlightening interviews conducted with 90 humanities scholars across 40 countries, the book offers a first step in attempting to assess the state of the humanities globally. Its topics include the nature and value of the humanities, the challenge of globalisation, the opportunities offered by the digital humanities, variations in funding patterns around the world, and the interaction between humanities and society. Despite the stereotypical view of humanists as scholars locked away in their ivory towers, the picture that emerges from this report is that they are deeply committed to the social value of their work and appreciate the long-term importance it has for addressing global challenges. The report will be of interest not only to researchers and students in the humanities themselves, but also to administrators and funders.
Authors: Poul Holm, Arne Jarrick, Dominic Scott
European Alliance for the Social Sciences and Humanities EASSH has has coordinated a collective response to the EU on the embedding of Social Sciences and the Humanities in the Societal Challenges outlined in Horizon 2020. The outcome text of the workshop can be found here: Advisory Group reports, Scoping Papers and Work-programme content.
The European Association of Sociology (EAS), the European Confederation of Political Science Associations (ECPSA), the European Educational Research Association (EERA), the European Association of Social Anthropologists (EASA) and the European Consortium for Humanities Institutes and Centres (ECHIC) have sent a joint letter to the European Commissioner for Research, Innovation and Science, expressing concern regarding the implementation of Horizon 2020 programme.
The main concerns expressed in the letter address the diminished funding for the SSH (social sciences and humanities) research and the narrow utilitarian approach to SSH reflected in the calls for proposals as well as in selection of experts.
The letter was also sent to members of European Parliament and members of the Programme Committee for Challenge 6 within the Horizon 2020, as well as to several media outlets in member states.
Read the full letter here.
Conference report of the Horizons of Social Sciences and Humanities, which took place in Vilnius in September 2013, is now available online. Besides the Vilnius Declaration, its objective is to present the practical results of the conference, e.g. recommendations for specific Societal Challenges in Horizon 2020.
Online version of conference report: http://horizons.mruni.eu/conference-report/
The collected recommendations section offers a list of recommendations how to better integrate social sciences and humanities into H 2020: http://horizons.mruni.eu/recommendations/
On the page "What follows" you can find forthcoming events and links to related initiatives.
The hard facts of the role of humanities in Horizon 2020 are not encouraging. The money set aside in the budget for Research Challenge 6 'Inclusive, Innovative and Reflective Societies’ is a meagre 400 million euro. The Commission has bundled the challenge with a number of cross-cutting initiatives which give the impression that funding is larger but most of this money will not go to humanities purposes. However, there will be funding for humanities approaches in the other challenges such as Health, Food, Transport, and Security.
In the aftermath of Vilnius a number of initiatives have been taken to express the dissatisfaction with this outcome. ECHIC signed a letter with representatives of social science organisations to the Commissioner in November calling for her warm words of support to be translated into real funding initiatives. In the same process, the outgoing chair of the ERC Prof Helga Nowotny, sent a letter on the same lines.
The Director-General Robert Jan Smits has now in a letter assured the willingness of the Commission to make the integration happen as proposed in the Vilnius Declaration. He states that it is planned to distribute the declaration to all Programme Committees. He writes, that approximately one quarter of all topics in Societal Challenges other than SC6, Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation will be flagged as SSH relevant, and that 15% of the appointed experts to Expert Advisory Groups have relevant interdisciplinary knowledge. And he informs us that Member States have confirmed that they will address the issue of integrating SSH at each H2020 kick-off event and that incentives of interdisciplinary research are highlighted.
Very importantly, Mr Smits endorses the idea to set-up CSA platforms in order to create spaces for the network and preparation of interdisciplinary projects. This is arcane language but what it means is that we have support for the idea put forward in our letter that Horizon 2020 needs to take a special initiative to encourage and include the SSH in all the research challenges by setting up support for synthesis centres. The reason for such an initiative is that currently a lot of humanities research is simply ignored because of lack of visibility. Discussions in Vilnius nade it very clear that for example the study of food cultures which has broad humanistic relevance will hardly be included in future calls under the Food challenge. Synthesis centres or Integrative Platforms as they are now called should be designed to call on and make visible the real potential of humanities research to inform research challenges.
Knowing the tricky way words may be used it is too early to assume that the CSA platforms are what we envision but it means that there is now an identifiable way forward. CSA is EU jargon for Coordination and Support Action and can be anything from very small to quite large so budget is another issue (a crucial one indeed!) and will depend on how well we argue the case.
ECHIC is pushing the idea of Integrative Platforms and has found support for the idea in Science Europe and elsewhere. The ECHIC conference in Porto will be an important opportunity to discuss and develop the idea.
Poul Holm, Chair of ECHIC Board
Trinity Long Room Hub Professor of Humanities
Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
Following up on the Vilnius conference, the following letter was sent to the EU Commissioner for Research, Innovation and Science Geoghegan-Quinn by the European Alliance for Social Sciences and Humanities (EASSH). In the letter EASSH protests against the evident sidelining – rather than mainstreaming – of the SSH and proposes:
The letter is signed by Poul Holm as Chair of ECHIC.
The European Federation of Academies of Science and Humanities, ALLEA, has produced a ‘roadmap’ showing how it wants to position social sciences and humanities research within the Horizon 2020 programme.
The document was drawn up by a working group of representatives from ALLEA member organisations, chaired by John Bell professor of law at the University of Cambridge, which met at the British Academy in London.
Their report insists that that the objectives of the Commission’s seven-year research strategy can only be achieved with the active involvement of social scientists and humanities researchers.
These “have a key contribution to make in defining and understanding the conditions for fostering innovative change and increasing the likelihood that innovation will lead to economic and societal progress,” the committee states.
The roadmap makes a number of specific recommendations including a plea for specific quotas for representatives from the social sciences and humanities on the expert advisory groups and committees leading the various Horison2020 programmes.